Saturday, 21 April 2012

Understanding introversion, high sensitivity and the importance of quiet ~ Susan Cain, Elaine Aron and Arthur Schopenhauer share their thoughts ~


Susan Cain has recently published a book entitled, "Quiet: the power of introverts in a world that can't stop talking" On the website linked to here she gives details about the book itself, lists reviews and resources and gives her speaking tour schedule.

I have just viewed her TED talk and must say I had rather an emotional response to her speech.  I think both introverts and extroverts could gain insight from it.



Elaine Aron has written wonderful books on the related topic of the Highly Sensitive temperament, a trait one is born with rather than acquiring from the environment of upbringing.  I gained huge benefit from titles listed below:
If you think you might be an HSP you can check here:
Here is Elaine talking about it:



She clarifies that Highly Sensitives are not necessarily introverts, in fact 30 percent are extroverts!

Any thoughtful person with reasonable sensitivity is likely to identify with German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's complaints in his essay on Noise, which I've written about before.  You can click through to the reading of Schopenhauer's essay on YouTube:
It's worth persevering through the opening part of the video which features a monkey working an electronic board game.

Readers may be pleased to know that at the end of a text version I found the following footnote:
"According to a notice from the Munich Society for the Protection of Animals, that superfluous whipping and cracking were strictly forbidden in Nuremberg in December 1858."
Bravo!

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Powerful memorials ~ Sarajevo's Red Line of chairs and the 'Blooms' installation in the Massachusetts Mental Health buildings ~

Painful memories can be helped by public acknowledgement.  Commemorative events usually take the form of concerts and speeches, and are marked by statues and plaques.  All of these can be helpful for providing a focus for those who are grieving or dealing with difficult memories.  Some memorial events go further and can take unexpected forms.  I found both the two events included here remarkable as well as moving: 

Sarajevo's Red Line:
Last week Sarajevo marked the twenty years since the beginning of the Bosnian war with a range of commemorative events, the most striking being the Red Line of 11,541 empty plastic chairs, one for every person who was killed in the 1992-96 siege of that city.  These were arranged in 825 rows across the width of the main street and stretched for 800 metres along it.  A concert was performed for all these absent citizens.  Thousands of passers-by came to pay their respects and many in the nearly silent crowds were reduced to tears.
In this article one observer is quoted: 
"It's as if the whole tragedy materialised, became visible," said Asja Rasavac, who covered her face with an umbrella, embarrassed for not being able to control the tears. "One cannot even describe the feeling. It's not hatred. It's not anger. It's just endless sadness."
The event was staged by the EastWest Theatre Company, which has a page dedicated to the event:

Blooms: an installation of 28,000 potted flowers crammed into a disused building:
Back in 2003 a memorial of a different although similarly powerful type was staged in a mental health facility that was scheduled for demolition.  Artist, Anna Schuleit, directed and staged an installation of potted flowers throughout the buildings, filling rooms and even corridors with colourful growing plant-life.  The visual effect was extraordinary and transformational!  You can read about it in this article on the Colossal art and design website dated 12th March 2012:
In the article the writer says:
"After an initial tour of the facility [the artist] was struck not with what she saw but with what she didn’t see: the presence of life and colour.  While historically a place of healing, the drab interior, worn hallways, and dull paint needed a respectful infusion of hope."
 The photographs are outstanding!
 You can read more about the installation on the
The effect of this installation proved to be moving as well as helpful to those who visited it, many of whom were former patients.  Comments written in the guest book relate that it provided an uplifting context for their memories.

After the exhibition closed Anna gave away all the plants to mental institutions, shelters and other such places - an inspired action.  It's a good example of a small gesture which may lift the spirits of those in need.  And let's not forget those in prison.

I extend grateful acknowledgement to Anna Schuleit, for permitting her copyright photos to be displayed with the article.  I do hope they remain there so that others may benefit from seeing them as I have.  They are inspiring.

I was helped by seeing both these installations, and link hands with those who stand in quiet remembrance.  

Saturday, 4 February 2012

Generosity, tolerance and good humour ~ taking care of ourselves and each other

What's the point of working so hard on our conflicts, both inner and outer, if the rest of the world is going mad, or simply carries on regardless?  It's not easy, but I still think it's worth it.  Given the choice I much prefer to live as fully as I can.  I more able to do so if I've found the balance within myself that comes from having come to terms with difficulties I've had in the past, and am also regularly doing what I can to contribute to the greater good in practical ways, however small.

The world seems to have become a increasingly dangerous and unstable place, yet there is much good: glorious sunrises, wondrous music, heartening friends, happy events...  

We often hear that in a global context we are all only six people removed from any other person in the world.  This means we are all much more closely connected than it would appear.  If this is so, we can surely make a difference by reaching out to those we do know or come across with at least an attitude of generosity, tolerance and good humour, where we feel confident to do so.  I don't think we have to do this with everyone: people we feel unsafe with will be someone else's friend who can reach out to them.  

I would hope that one way and another, there is enough energy in the whole thing for it all to work out.  If anything is going to hold the balance for our shared future, I think it will be this, not braininess, not science, not Messiahs, but simple ordinary companionship and generosity, which starts with those we love. 

The generosity of many people over the years has made it possible for me to reach the place where I am now in my life.  I want to pass that on, with these Chronicles, and with hopes of a happier, healthier, more stable world for us all.

This video clip seems a fitting note to close on:



This article (less the video clip) was originally published in Part 5 of Rushleigh ~ The Wasteland Chronicle, under the title 'Holding the balance and passing the torch'.

Friday, 3 February 2012

'What is man, his days are as grass...'

'What is man, his days are as grass.  Though he rise today above the vulgar democratic leaves of grass as high as a towering stalk of fools-parley, tomorrow the scythe of the mower will leave him as low as the dandelion.  What is a social status nowadays?  The wind passeth over it and it is gone, though the place thereof may see it again next summer, even the crown of the cow-parsnip soaring above the herd of green...'

Excerpt from Chapter 13 of "Mr Noon, Part Two" by D. H. Lawrence.

My review of this book can be found in Rushleigh's Entertainment Chronicle:

Friday, 11 November 2011

War ~ U.S. Iraq War Veterans speak out ~ as have Howard Zinn and Robert McNamara

War is a painful business in which all manner of horrendous loss is unavoidable.       
     The pain soldiers experience in wartime duty is not commonly aired on the news, especially when that war is still being fought - it's too messy and uncomfortable, especially for those authorising and leading those wars - as well as those who are paying for it, largely the taxpaying public.  
     But in a personal sense it's far more messy and uncomfortable for individual soldiers to publicly speak out against the very war in which they have been involved, speaking from direct personal experience of what went wrong - that takes guts and a very strong commitment to a sense of justice greater than themselves; this means everyone - including the people they've been dominating and controlling.

Here is what we have NOT been shown on the television news:



IVAW stands for 'Iraq Veterans Against the War'.  It is a group of veterans who are committed to speaking out with the intention of stopping the war - what courage!  I wish you courageous men and women strength and success.

Two other notable war veterans have also examined their wartime experience and spoken out about the destructiveness of war with similar rigour and determination: these men were Howard Zinn and Robert S. McNamara.  Better ways of resolving international conflicts must be found.
 
Howard Zinn, who featured in my previous article, spoke eloquently about the complexities of war and the impossibility of achieving anything constructive without overwhelming destruction and loss to all parties.  I have his book "Terrorism and war", published in 2002, in front of me.  He said 
In war the evil of the means is certain and the achievement of the end, however important, is always uncertain.  That is, war always sets off a chain of events that are unpredictable.  For instance, in World War 2, you could not be certain that you would defeat fascism.  You might be fairly certain that you could defeat Hitler and Mussolini, but you could not be certain that you would be doing away with all the elements of fascism, with militarism, racism, imperialism, and violence.  In fact, after 50 million deaths that did not happen.  Considering these issues, and thinking about the prospects of the human race given the horrifying technology of war, persuaded me that there could be no longer really be a war we could call just.  I decided that whatever world situations we faced, whatever act of aggression we faced, we had to come up with a solution other than the mass killing of human beings.  (page 22-23)
His anti-war stance was influenced by his wartime service in the air force as a bombardier.  He had gone to war to fight fascism, so he is not saying this lightly.  After the war he went back to some of the areas he had bombed and faced up to what happened on the ground as a result.  In the Wikipedia article linked to above he is quoted as having written:
I suggest that the history of bombing—and no one has bombed more than this nation—is a history of endless atrocities, all calmly explained by deceptive and deadly language like 'accident', 'military target', and 'collateral damage'".[12]
On page 16 he says:
We have to broaden our definition of terrorism, or else we will denounce one terrorism and accept another.  And we need to create conditions in the world where the terrorism of sects and terrorism of governments are both opposed by people all over the world.  [...]  You hear journalists and politicians talking about globalisation and the free flow of markets.  But they don't talk about international solidarity of people.  They don't say that we should consider people everywhere as our brothers and sisters - that we should consider children all over the world as our children.
Here you can see this mild-mannered and thoughtful man for yourselves:



Robert S. McNamara, whose seven year tenure as U.S. Secretary of Defense put him in a pivotal role in the Vietnam war, spoke out against it with considerable candour later in life.  Much of this is recorded in his documentary film:
  • "The Fog of War", and 
  • also in his book "In retrospect: the tragedy and lessons of Vietnam".  
He admitted that his strategy in Vietnam was wrong.  He was highly intelligent and conscientiously did not flinch from telling the hard truths as he saw them.  I admire him for that.

It is fair to note that during his involvement in the Vietnam war he did hold the middle ground between defence force chiefs, who wanted to bomb Vietnam with nuclear weapons, and ever-swelling public opinion against the war.  The question of what could have happened if the defence chiefs had been given free rein by a more easily influenced Secretary of Defense doesn't bear thinking about as the consequences would certainly have been cataclysmic.  We might none of us be here today.

By the time he was himself advising a sharp reduction in military involvement in Vietnam, President Johnson was no longer listening to him and he resigned.  American military involvement continued there until 1973 and the war itself dragged on until 1975.

However disastrous his policies in Vietnam were he faced up to it and and spoke out about it.  He seems to have spent the rest of his life doing what he could to redress the balance, devoting much time and effort to alleviating poverty while he was president of the World Bank, and after that to developing thinking about how catastrophic armed conflicts could be reduced or avoided:

Wikipedia notes that:
McNamara served as head of the World Bank from April 1968 to June 1981, when he turned 65.[28] In his thirteen years at the Bank, he introduced key changes, most notably, shifting the Bank's focus towards targeted poverty reduction. He negotiated, with the conflicting countries represented on the Board, a spectacular growth in funds to channel credits for development, in the form of health, food, and education projects. He also instituted new methods of evaluating the effectiveness of funded projects. 
The obituary on the Arms Control Association website gives more insight into his standpoint on nuclear arms, which also shifted over the years.

His book "Wilson's ghost: Reducing the risk of conflict, killing and catastrophe in the 21st century", (published in 2001, 2003) which was co-written with James G. Blight, is probably less well known than "In retrospect".  On the back cover the afterword states:
The 20th Century was the bloodiest in human history; over 160 million people died in wars and other armed conflicts.  And as we've seen in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the United States itself, the 21st century has gotten off to a similar start.  'Wilson's Ghost' is a manifesto for ending this terrible human carnage, a call to action made especially urgent as America has embarked on an open-ended war on terrorism. [...]
This is sobering reading.  The Wilson referred to in the title is President Woodrow Wilson, whose post World War 1 efforts to establish fair and reasonable common ground-rules for international relations failed to gain sufficient votes to become reality and has not been matched by anything similar since.

Here are four clips of McNamara speaking; three are excerpts from 'The Fog of War'.  Please note that none of these are nice and many may find them distressing.  Having said that, unless we learn from history, we are likely to be doomed to repeat it - even more violently than before.  I'll let him speak for himself:









So what can we do about all this?  The first and most vital thing we can do is to learn more about these topics from those who have the wisdom of experience.  This can make us more able to see political power manoeuvring for what it is, and more able to formulate our own opinions and to voice them clearly.  Ignorance so readily produces the fear and divisions in which violence and hatred can take root.  If we know our history and are well informed we can provide a degree of the stability and good sense that is so much needed in the world today.

Recommended materials:
  • "The Fog of War" (2003): The film documentary mentioned above is packed full of history and insightful comment.  It is available on DVD.  It's one of the most helpful documentaries I've seen on any subject, and encouraged me to find out more about this very complex and difficult subject. 
  • Madeleine Albright's book, "The Mighty and the Almighty: Reflections on Power, God and World Affairs" (2006) as discussed in my earlier article which I have linked to here.  This book is first rate and easy to read.
  • For New Zealanders looking for more about this country's involvement in wars I highly recommend Michael King's book "New Zealanders at war".  (Revised edition published in 2003)
  • Those looking for information on trauma and PTSD may find useful references in my earlier article entitled Trauma ~ comments and links.
Today is Remembrance Day,  a memorial day observed in Commonwealth countries since the end of World War 1 to remember those in their defence force who have died 'in the line of duty'.

I remember all those caught up in the holocausts of war in all its horrifying guises. 
I remember my great grandfather's brother who died in France who left behind a fiancée.
I remember my great grandfather whose military career took him to many places on the globe, for the sake of the Empire, and then after his retirement, maintaining law and order in his home town.
I remember those who strived for peace in other ways, the conscientious objectors, who refused to kill: I remember my father.
I remember those who spoke out and supported them through the pacifist movement: I remember my grandmother.
I remember those who went to war and did not die but were deeply affected by their experiences and carried life long burdens as a result:
I remember my grandfather who almost lost his life in France, during World War 1, and was so upset with his son and wife for their refusal to join the war effort during World War 2;
I remember my other grandfather who willingly went to war as a military doctor for the duration of World War 2 - and was never the same afterwards.
I remember my other grandmother, who spent those long years as a sole parent, managing her young family and coping on her own, and then coped with my grandfather on his return. 

Echoes of these resound down through the years and the generations that have followed.
Yes, I remember.
It has rained solidly all day.  Even the skies weep.

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

"Civil disobedience... is not our problem..." ~ Howard Zinn

Howard Zinn (1922 - 2010) was an American historian, academic, author and impassioned human rights campaigner.  His work is new to me but it seems he may be most well known for his best selling book "A People's History of the United States".


In his book "Failure to Quit" (Page 45) he wrote:
You are saying our problem is civil disobedience, but that is not our problem.

Our problems is civil obedience.

Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience.

Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world, in the face of poverty, starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty.

Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and the while the grand thieves are running the country.

That's our problem.
His point was based on the observation that it is widespread pressure from the general public that motivates politicians to bring about political and legal changes.  If that pressure is not applied progress will not occur, therefore a degree of political involvement and / or activism is essential to the democratic process.

He also wrote:
What we choose to emphasize in this complex history will determine our lives.  If we see only the worst, it destroys our capacity to do something.  If we remember those times and places - and there are so many - where people have behaved magnificently, it energizes us to act, and raises at least the possibility of sending this spinning top of a world in a different direction.  And if we do act, in however small a way, we don't have to wait for some grand utopian future.  The future is an infinite succession of presents, and to live now as we think human beings should live, in defiance of all that is bad around us, is itself a marvellous victory.
This quote is from" A Power Governments Cannot Suppress", page 170

In his article, "Changing minds one at a time" (2005) he wrote:
We were not born critical of existing society. There was a moment in our lives (or a month, or a year) when certain facts appeared before us, startled us, and then caused us to question beliefs that were strongly fixed in our consciousness-embedded there by years of family prejudices, orthodox schooling, imbibing of newspapers, radio, and television. This would seem to lead to a simple conclusion: that we all have an enormous responsibility to bring to the attention of others information they do not have, which has the potential of causing them to rethink long-held ideas.  
I can certainly identify with these thoughts!

The above quote is from the Wikipedia article about him as linked to above.  It's an interesting article, well worth taking time to read.  We need people like this to help us keep our sights on what is important. 

Thanks to the writers of the Wikipedia article, and also the photographer for their generosity in sharing as they have.

You can find more of his quotable quotes at the Good Reads site and Gaiam Life.

Article updated: 11th April 2012.

Sunday, 11 September 2011

Perceptions of truth and deceit ~ and a quote about the mentally disabled

Oliver Sacks, the well known neurologist and writer, speaks eloquently about the special capabilities of some people in distinguishing between truth and falsehoods.  These people are not clairvoyants or spiritual teachers, they are among the mentally disabled.  The following passage can be found in his very readable book “The man who mistook his wife for a hat”.  In this chapter he describes the response of the aphasics as well as an agnosiac to 'the President's speech'.  The chapter opens:
What was going on? A roar of laughter from the aphasia ward, just as the President's speech was coming on, and they had all been so eager to hear the President speaking. ...
There he was, the old Charmer, the Actor, with his practised rhetoric, his histrionisms, his emotional appeal – and [most of] the patients were convulsed with laughter. ...
Thus the feeling I sometimes have – which all of us who work closely with aphasiacs have – that one cannot lie to an aphasiac. He cannot grasp your words, and so cannot be deceived by them; but what he grasps he grasps with infallible precision, namely the expression that goes with the words, that total, spontaneous, involuntary expressiveness which can never be simulated or faked, as words alone can, all too easily. ... And what dogs can do here, aphaisacs do too, and at a human and immeasurably superior level. 'One can lie with the mouth,' Nietzsche writes, 'but with the accompanying grimace one nevertheless tells the truth.' To such a grimace, to any falsity or impropriety in bodily appearance or posture, aphasiacs are preternaturally sensitive. And if they cannot see one – this is especially true of our blind aphasiacs – they have an infallible ear for every vocal nuance, the tone, the rhythm, the cadences, the music, the subtlest modulations, inflections, intonations, which can give – or remove – verisimilitude to or from a man's voice. ...

Among the patients with tonal agnosia on our aphasia ward who also listened to the President's speech was Emily D., ... A former English teacher, and poetess of some repute, with an exceptional feeling for language, and strong powers of analysis and expression, Emily D. was able to articulate the opposite situation – how the Presidents speech sounded to someone with tonal agnosia. Emily D. could no longer tell if a voice was angry, cheerful, sad – whatever. Since voices now lacked expression, she had to look at people's faces, their postures and movements when they talked, and found herself doing so with care, an intensity, she had never shown before... Emily D. also listened, stony faced, so the President's speech, bringing to it a strange mixture of enhanced and defective perceptions – precisely the opposite mixture of those of our aphasiacs. It did not move her – no speech now moved her – and all that was evocative, genuine or false, completely passed her by. Deprived of emotional reaction, was she then (like the rest of us) transported or taken in? By no means. 'He is not cogent,' she said. “He does not speak good prose. His word-use is improper. Either he is brain-damaged, or he has something to conceal.' Thus the President's speech did not work for Emily D. either, due to her enhanced sense of formal language use, propriety of prose, any more than it worked for our aphasiacs, with their word-deafness but enhanced sense of tone.

Here then was the paradox of the President's speech. We normals – aided, doubtless, by our wish to be fooled – were well and truly fooled. ... And so cunningly was deceptive word-use combined with deceptive tone, that only the brain-damaged remained intact, undeceived.
This is sobering comment: with reference to my earlier article 'Evaluating teachers and healers ~ spirituality and healing vs delusion and chaos', Bill Hamilton and I both hold the same view: that it can take quite some time to be sure that a teacher, healer or guru type is genuine, that saints and those who masquerade as such can appear virtually indistinguishable, yet we read here that some of those who might be considered far less mentally competent than ourselves get it in one shot.  Have we become so inured to the partial truths we come across in everyday life that we have lost our ability to recognise the truth when it's right under our noses?  It would seem so.  This other view is certainly illuminating, but given the limitations that most of us have, I still hold that taking time to arrive at our own verdicts is the best course.  It does also show how worthwhile it can be to listen to other people's points of view, including those whom you might not expect to have this level of insight. 

This article was originally published in Part Three of 'Rushleigh - The Wasteland Chronicle'.  It is duplicated here for your interest.

Book store links for interested readers:
"The Man who mistook his wife for a hat" by Oliver Sacks
Amazon.com


Amazon.co.uk - other edition available


Fishpond.co.nz - other edition available
The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales